 Hair Style, Spikey, long etc. |
|
  |
|
Guest_Nasgrath_*
|
  Aug 11 2003, 04:58 AM
Post
#1
|
Guests |
Wouldnt it be cool to have players choose hairstyles and or clothing styles too? Like for the hair: Spikey, long, short and such. and for the clothes: Baggy, tight and such?
I know its much work and all, but then we dont look all the same anymore, eh. |
 |
 
|
|
Xinul
|
Aug 11 2003, 06:32 AM
Post
#2
|
|
Group: Furres |
Alright, say you want 3 different shirts, 3 different hairstyles, and 3 different sets of pants...
Each form of a player requires a 80 forms (Winged included) now if you were to add in those 3 shirts, 3 hairstyles, and 3 sets of pants, it would be the equivalent of 2000 images, per walkabout (80 current images * 3 shirts *3 pants *3 hairstyles= 2160 images per walkabout) And how many player sets would be un-usable because of this addition? It doenst sound very practical to impliment now. If it were in the earlier stages, it sounds like a good edition if it werent going to be so much work... what artist wants to create 2160 images for one walkabout. Note: The number 2160 includes the images needed for wings on an avatar also. |
|
|
|
|
mightywayne
|
 Aug 11 2003, 06:40 AM
Post
#3
|
|
Group: Furres |
Well, you have a point..but maybe only one hairstyle? Making it long, or short? Or maybe a hat? It sounds like a good idea...it would just mess up lot's of people's FSH. 'Specially people that spent lots of time in their avatars..IE- Pokemon Paradise.
|
|
|
|
|
Reunion
|
Aug 11 2003, 06:45 AM
Post
#4
|
|
Group: Furres |
For now you can have a personal portrait.
|
|
|
|
|
Guest_Nasgrath_*
|
Aug 11 2003, 06:53 AM
Post
#5
|
|
Guests |
Mmh, thats true, never thought of the many images involved for that to succeed.. Well, it may never come out but it would be neat.. Aw well.
|
|
|
|
|
Guest_Mudon Witfar_*
|
Aug 11 2003, 11:37 AM
Post
#6
|
|
Guests |
I think this might be an option when we get 3d avatars... But that won't happen for a very long time.
|
|
|
|
|
Ghranaghin
|
Aug 11 2003, 02:08 PM
Post
#7
|
|
Group: Furres |
Maybe we need to do the avatars a different way...
Say, instead of having different avs with wings, without wings etc, just have normal avs and give the game wing graphics by themselves and tell the game how to "attach them" to the furre, etc. |
|
|
|
|
Tanasha
|
Aug 11 2003, 03:03 PM
Post
#8
|
|
Group: Furres |
Could we go to a 3D system? Similar to NWN, perhaps?
|
|
|
|
|
Draken-Korin
|
Aug 11 2003, 03:12 PM
Post
#9
|
|
Group: Furres |
God no.
|
|
|
|
|
Guest_Nasgrath_*
|
Aug 11 2003, 03:15 PM
Post
#10
|
|
Guests |
QUOTE(Tanasha @ Aug 11 2003, 09:03 AM) Could we go to a 3D system? Similar to NWN, perhaps? Then it wont be accesible for almost all people, for NWN need a 3d card. (right?) |
|
|
|
|
Draken-Korin
|
Aug 11 2003, 03:24 PM
Post
#11
|
|
Group: Furres |
You know, as much as I despise NWN, I've got to take argument with that statement.
Anyone who doesn't have a 3D-capable video card at this point needs to shell out 5 bucks and get one. |
|
|
|
|
Saturn Knight
|
Aug 11 2003, 03:55 PM
Post
#12
|
|
Group: Furres |
What if you don't want clothes? We should have the choice to walk around naked.
|
|
|
|
|
Ridia
|
Aug 11 2003, 04:09 PM
Post
#13
|
|
Group: Furres |
Just make your clothes as close to fur/markigns colors as possible.
 YOUR IMAGINATION CAN SORE! ...I mean, soar!! |
|
|
|
|
Guest_Nasgrath_*
|
Aug 11 2003, 10:39 PM
Post
#14
|
|
Guests |
Amen.
|
|
|
|
|
Tanasha
|
Aug 11 2003, 11:44 PM
Post
#15
|
|
Group: Furres |
You don't need a 3D card to play 3D games. Half-Life was designed for 486s and Pentiums doing software rendering.
I doubt anybody would be running anything less than that, and I doubt that Furc3D would *need* hl-level detail ^^ |
|
|
|
|
Southside Coleman
|
Aug 12 2003, 06:45 AM
Post
#16
|
|
Group: Furres |
QUOTE Anyone who doesn't have a 3D-capable video card at this point needs to shell out 5 bucks and get one. I don't have that much to waste! |
|
|
|
|
| Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 11th July 2025 - 11:56 PM |