Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Summer Specials, Click Here!
 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Question About Dream Limits, Only 300 people in 1 dream?
Chyna Rose
post Apr 5 2008, 05:35 PM
Post #1
Group: Furres



Someone at my giveaway said only 300 people can be in a dream at once...Is that true?

I've had 300 people in chynatown before smile.gif

Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Emerald Flame
post Apr 5 2008, 06:36 PM
Post #2
Group: DEP Admins



299 minus a few required processes like Master Socket used to be the limit. It was raised when FurN started getting full messages. I think it's something like 440 players now! :)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Chyna Rose
post Apr 5 2008, 07:15 PM
Post #3
Group: Furres



When I win the lottery and start giving away thousands of dollars in digos maybe I'll get 440 people se.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Graphite
post Apr 6 2008, 12:47 AM
Post #4
Group: Furres



What an odd limit... I had somehow expected something like 127/128 or 255/256. Those are the more 'common' limits of software. The next limit up from that is 32767-ish so I doubt that one would've been a problem tongue.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Rydia Aslin
post Apr 6 2008, 09:29 AM
Post #5
Group: Furres



It's probably something specified directly by DEP, so no need to rely on the power-of-2 limits. 440 still seems kinda odd as opposed to 400 or 450, though. XD

Actually, if you following the ^2 methodology, the next 'limit' would be 512, would it not?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Dreamless Dancer
post Apr 6 2008, 09:36 AM
Post #6
Group: Furres



Why assume that everything in programming must be a base 2 sized number?

Why would 440 be strange?

Heck, that's a valid 3 phase voltage value.
  1. 110
  2. 110
  3. 220
ninja.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Damadar
post Apr 6 2008, 11:28 AM
Post #7
Group: Furres



The word "common" comes to mind. =p
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Tachs
post Apr 6 2008, 11:35 AM
Post #8
Group: Furres



I can't help to say this, but...

Wow, you guys are dorks.

<3
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
sanctimonious
post Apr 6 2008, 01:44 PM
Post #9
Group: DEP Admins



Well, it's very simple, really. In hexadecimals, 440 spellls 1B8, or "I BATE", which is only fitting.

That, uh, that isn't dorky, right? ;)

-s!-

Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Tachs
post Apr 6 2008, 03:32 PM
Post #10
Group: Furres



Yes. Yes it is.

-Stamps 'Dork!' on his forehead.-

>8C
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Felorin
post Apr 6 2008, 04:39 PM
Post #11
Group: DEP Admins



I got over my "make things powers of 2 for a little more efficiency and/or geekiness" mostly back in the old 8 bit or 16 bit days. These days I like to make numbers Real People can relate to, 'cause now real people play computer games and I want y'all to come play Furcadia too. That's why I also start numbers or lists of things at 1 whenever I remember to instead of at 0 like programmers do.

Of course the new dream limit was programmed by sanctimonious anyway and not by me. I would say "1B8" doesn't spell "I Bate" or even "I bait" (a fisherman's battlecry?), but more like "I be eight". Which is too young for the Furcadia server software to be saying, since it's 11 (plus parts of the DragonSpires code are older). And it's too old for me to say, at least mentally - ask Emerald Flame on that. (No, really I claim to be mentally about 12, but only 'cause I don't wanna be a teenager and get acne.)

And when you see something that counts from 0 upwards instead of one, I blame sanctimonious. Even when it's not actually his fault!

If y'all fill some dreams up we will pick a new number. 667, the neighbor of the beast, might upset some religious people. 812 is part of the famous OU812 so that has potential. What numbers do YOU all like, and why?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Chyna Rose
post Apr 6 2008, 06:00 PM
Post #12
Group: Furres



42! sb.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Rydia Aslin
post Apr 6 2008, 08:10 PM
Post #13
Group: Furres



I've always been a fan of 42 myself, too (everyone loves molybdenum!), but it might be too small for a capacity limit, hehe.

How 'bout... 5318008?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Chyna Rose
post Apr 6 2008, 09:30 PM
Post #14
Group: Furres



QUOTE
How 'bout... 5318008?


I think we need bigger dreams sg.gif

Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Graphite
post Apr 9 2008, 03:52 AM
Post #15
Group: Furres



QUOTE(Felorin @ Apr 6 2008, 04:39 PM) [snapback]355375[/snapback]
I got over my "make things powers of 2 for a little more efficiency and/or geekiness" mostly back in the old 8 bit or 16 bit days. These days I like to make numbers Real People can relate to, 'cause now real people play computer games and I want y'all to come play Furcadia too. That's why I also start numbers or lists of things at 1 whenever I remember to instead of at 0 like programmers do.


I wasn't saying you would've consciously chosen 255 or so, but more so that due to the way it is implemented 255 becomes the natural barrier. For stuff like mapsize I agree that you should pick sensible numbers, but the number of furres in a dream is more an implementation detail and as such more prone to the power-of-two limits.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 2nd September 2010 - 12:34 PM